Cricket’s lawmakers have spent the past eighteen months rewriting some of the sport’s finer technical rules, and as of this month both headline changes are now fully in force. The Marylebone Cricket Club formally wrote its ban on so-called “bunny-hop” boundary catches into the Laws of Cricket in October 2026, closing a loophole that had turned a legal fielding technique into one of the sport’s more contentious talking points, while the International Cricket Council’s reworked concussion substitute protocol, introduced for the 2025-27 World Test Championship cycle, has now been operating through more than a year of Test cricket.
What a Bunny-Hop Actually Is
The technique takes its name from fielders who, while standing just inside the boundary rope, jump to intercept a ball before it crosses the line, tap it back into the field of play while airborne, and land outside the rope, a sequence that under the old wording still counted as a legal save or catch provided the fielder’s first and last contact with the ball happened inside the boundary. The move produced some of the most athletic highlights in modern limited-overs cricket, but it also created moments that looked, to most viewers, like the ball had plainly crossed the rope. The rule’s most famous flashpoint came from Michael Neser’s boundary save during a 2023 Big Bash League match, a passage of play that was legal under the old Law but drew sustained criticism for looking like six runs that were taken away.
How the New Law Works
Under the revised wording, a fielder who has already gone outside the boundary line is permitted only one further airborne touch of the ball. After that single touch, the boundary becomes what officials describe as a hard line: the fielder must have both feet grounded inside the field of play for any subsequent contact to count, whether completing a catch or preventing a boundary. The law also addresses relay catches explicitly, requiring every fielder involved in the chain to have last touched the ground inside the boundary before making contact with the ball. One technique remains untouched: a fielder who pushes the ball up from inside the rope, steps outside, and then dives back in to complete the catch is still playing within the Laws.
The Concussion Substitute Rework
Running in parallel is a separate overhaul of the ICC’s concussion substitute protocol, introduced from the opening Test of the current World Test Championship cycle at Galle in mid-2025 and now well into its second year of use. The old process allowed teams to nominate a replacement only after a player was diagnosed with concussion mid-match, a system that drew criticism after a high-profile India-England T20I in which India’s call to bring on Harshit Rana in place of an injured Shivam Dube was seen by critics as stretching the “like-for-like” standard well past its intended meaning. Under the new protocol, both teams must name a panel of five pre-approved concussion substitutes before a match even begins: one wicketkeeper, one specialist batter, one seam bowler, one spinner, and one all-rounder, removing the guesswork and gamesmanship that had crept into real-time substitution decisions.
A Backstop for the Backstop
The ICC also built in a safety valve for the rare case where a nominated substitute is themselves concussed during the same match: the match referee retains the authority to approve a replacement from outside the original five-player list, provided the standard like-for-like criteria are still met. Separately, the ICC’s Medical Advisory Committee recommended, and the governing body accepted, a minimum seven-day stand-down period for any player diagnosed with a concussion before they can return to competitive play, a change aimed squarely at preventing players from returning to action before the full effects of a head injury have resolved.
Why Administrators Moved on Both Fronts at Once
Though unrelated in substance, the two changes share a common thread: both responded to moments where the literal wording of the Laws produced outcomes that felt, to players, broadcasters, and fans alike, out of step with the spirit of the game. Boundary-catch controversies and concussion substitute disputes both tend to arrive in high-stakes, high-visibility matches, and lawmakers at MCC headquarters in London and ICC’s Dubai offices have both said they would rather close the loophole proactively than wait for a tournament final to expose it on the largest possible stage.
What Comes Next for Umpires and Broadcasters
With both rules now fully embedded, the practical test shifts to match officials and broadcast review teams, who must apply the boundary-catch standard in real time using the same slow-motion technology that exposed the old loophole in the first place, and who must track which five players each team has pre-nominated for concussion coverage before a ball is bowled. Expect commentary teams to spend the early weeks of upcoming series walking viewers through both changes whenever a close boundary chance or a head injury forces the rules into the spotlight, a reminder that even cricket’s most arcane regulations tend to get rewritten only after they have already caused a headline-grabbing argument.
Photo: Ylanite / PIXABAY via Pixabay